Journal of Modern Engineering and Technology
Author Guidelines...
Research paper, review paper and case study. Please ensure that you select the appropriate article type from the list of options when making your submission.
Submit your manuscript to the journal website through the page (submit your manuscript) as an author. Then, manuscripts may be submitted electronically to the Editor.
After submission, the Editor sends a confirmation message to the corresponding author within 24 hours. Please contact the Editor if you fail to receive this confirmation mail within 24 Hours.
All manuscripts must be suitable for the Journals Paper Template. We only accept manuscripts in the English language. The main text must be between 5000 words, excluding appendices or references. You can reach the Journal’s template.
The Journal has a double-masked system for the peer-review process; it reviews the identities of the reviewer and the author anonymously.
The manuscript will be peer-reviewed by three specialized scholars, two external reviewers, and one Editor from the Journal who will be involved in the review process.
The review process is completed within 60-90 workdays. The results of the review process will be e-mailed to the corresponding author. The author(s) will be notified if the reviewers accept the paper. The accepted manuscript will be available for download on the Journal’s website.
As part of the submission process, authors must check that their submissions comply with the following items. Submissions that do not adhere to these guidelines may be returned to authors.
The submission has not been previously published, nor has it been before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, RTF, or WordPerfect document file format.
Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
The text is single-spaced, uses a 12-point font, employs italics rather than underlining (except with URL addresses), and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points rather than at the end.
If submitting to a peer-reviewed journal section, the instructions in Ensuring a Blind Review have been followed.
Please ensure that all references indicate their DOI numbers if they are available.
The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed journal directly reflects the quality of the authors’ work. Peer-reviewed articles improve the quality of publication and enhance scientific techniques. Hence, all parties involved in publishing—the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, and the publisher—should follow publication ethics.
Responsibilities of Editor in Chief and Editorial Board Members
The editor-in-chief, with assigned editorial board members, shall be responsible for changes required in the content and template of manuscripts submitted to the journal. A double-masked review process must review the submitted review/research manuscript, and if required, the editor can take additional opinions. The editor shall ensure the peer review process is fair, unbiased, and timely. All submitted manuscripts for review must be confidential, and any information must not be disclosed to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, or publisher. Editor-in-Chief cannot publish his own review/research paper in the journal and must not be involved in decisions about papers written by family members. Editors shall conduct a proper and fair investigation into ethical complaints.
Responsibilities of Authors
All manuscripts must be the original work of authors and not plagiarism. Authors must accept authorship of a manuscript and should have significant contributions from all authors. Authors must appropriately and precisely recognize the work of others. Authors should mention any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that may impact the results or interpretation of their manuscript and acknowledge individuals or organizations that have provided financial research support. Authors may be asked to provide additional content or material related to submitted manuscripts during peer review, which must be opened publicly if possible. All manuscripts must be previously unpublished and not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
Responsibility of Reviewers
The reviewer’s process must be confidential by the reviewer, and the manuscript received for review or information about the paper must not be shared with anyone. Reviewers should provide details of the review and their opinions about the paper with supporting arguments in the format supplied by the editor. Reviewers should complete their reviews within the journal’s stipulated timeframe. Reviewers should not review manuscripts with conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.